［1］BERNAL J D.历史上的科学［M］.伍况甫, 彭家礼, 译.北京:科学出版社, 1959: 685.

［2］SALOMON J J. Science and politics ［M］.Cambridge: MIT Press,1973.

［3］GILPIN R, WRIGHT C. Scientists and national policy-making ［M］.New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.

［4］MAASEN S, WEINGART P.专业知识的民主化？: 探求科学咨询的新模式［M］.姜江, 马晓琨, 秦兰, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2010.

［5］BUSH V.科学: 没有止境的前沿［M］.范岱年, 谢道华, 译.北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.

［6］STOKES D E.基础科学与技术创新:巴斯德象限［M］.周春彦,谷春立, 译.北京:科学出版社, 1999.

［7］KITCHER P. Science, truth, and democracy ［M］.New York:Oxford University Press, 2001.

［8］JASANOFF S. Accounting for expertise ［J］.Science and Public Policy, 2003, 30(3):157-162.

［9］GUSTON D H.在政治与科学之间: 确保科学研究的诚信与产出率［M］.龚旭, 译.北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 15-20.

［10］EZRAHI Y. Utopian and pragmatic rationalism: the political context of scientific advice ［J］.Minerva, 1980, 18(1):111-131.

［11］PRICE D K. Government and science ［M］.New York: New York University Press, 1954.

［12］FUNTOWICZ S. Why knowledge assessment? ［J］.Interfaces Between Science & Society, 2006, 9:137-145.

［13］PIELKE R A.诚实的代理人: 科学在政策与政治中的意义［M］.李正飞, 缪航, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2010:13-19.

［14］刘立.科学共同体: 做有良知的参政议政者［J］.民主与科学,2011(4): 30-31.

［15］JASANOFF S.第五部门: 当科学顾问成为政策制定者［M］.陈光, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2011: 44, 287-289.

［16］RESNIK D.政治与科学的博弈: 科学独立性与政府监督之间的平衡［M］.陈光, 白成太, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社,2015: 87.

［17］MCGANN J, SABATINI R.全球智库: 政策网络与治理［M］.韩雪, 王小文, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2015: 5.

［18］COZZENS S E, WOODHOUSE E J. Science, government, and the politics of knowledge［M］//JASANOFF S, MARKLE G E,PETERSEN J C, et al. Handbook of science and technology : Sage Publications, 1995:533-553.

［19］SMITH B L R. The advisers: scientists in the policy process ［M］.Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1992:68-100.

［20］ROCHEFORT D A, COBB R W. The politics of problem definition:shaping the policy agenda ［M］.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1994:10-15.

［21］KELLER A C. Good science, green policy: the role of scientists in environmental policy in the United States ［D］. Berkeley:University of California, 2001:21-47.

［22］刘海波.论科技政策决策过程的专家参与［J］.自然辩证法研究, 1998, 14(7): 52-55.

［23］汝鹏, 苏竣.政府与科学家关系及科技决策机制优化: 以“科技类型-政策阶段”空间为视角［J］.科学学研究, 2010,28(12): 1814-1818.

［24］LENTSCH J, WEINGART P.政策制定中的科学咨询: 国际比较［M］.王海芸, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2015: 2-3.

［25］BARBEN D. Changing regimes of science and politics: comparative and transnational perspectives for a world in transition ［J］.Science and Public Policy, 2007, 34(1):55-69.

［26］WAGNER P, HELLMUT W. Social scientists in policy research and consulting: some cross-national comparisons ［J］.International Social Science Journal, 1986, 38(4):601-617.

［27］HALFFMAN W. Science-policy boundaries: national styles? ［J］.Science and Public Policy, 2005, 32(6): 457-467.

［28］IRWIN A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the new scientific governance ［J］. Social Studies of Science, 2006, 36(2):299-320.

［29］WEILL C. Can consultation of both experts and the public help developing public policy? Some aspects of the debate in France ［J］.Science and Public Policy, 2003, 30(3): 199-203.

［30］CROSS A. Guidelines for expert advice. Drawing up guidelines for the collection and use of expert advice: the experience of the European Commission ［J］. Science and Public Policy, 2003,30(3):189-192.

［31］HILGARTNER S.在科学的舞台上: 作为公共戏剧的专家咨询［M］.赵延东, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2015: 28.

［32］BIJKER W, BAL R, HENDRIKS R.科学权威的矛盾性: 科学咨询在民主社会中的作用［M］.施云燕, 朱晓军, 译.上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2015: 6-12.

［33］张志强, 苏娜.国际智库发展趋势特点与我国新型智库建设［J］.智库理论与实践, 2016, (1): 15-18.

［34］季婉婧, 曲建升.国际典型科技智库的类型及其产品特点分析［J］.图书与情报, 2012, (5): 93-97.

［35］栾瑞英, 初景利.国外典型高水平科技智库运行机制剖析与启示［J］.中国科技论坛, 2017(11): 175-179.

文章来源：《天天爱科学》 网址: http://www.ttakx.cn/qikandaodu/2020/1103/421.html